Evidently Admissible? ⚠️🔍

Welcome to Answers on Law, the newsletter that brings you up to speed on everything you need to know about legal concepts. No expertise required.

First time reader? Sign up to get Answers in your inbox, twice-weekly, for free:

How is evidence admitted and excluded in criminal trials?

In the courtroom drama of criminal trials, the admission and exclusion of evidence plays a paramount role in seeking justice. Evidence must pass through a rigorous examination of its relevance, reliability, and legality to ensure a fair trial. Grasping the rules that govern this process is critical in understanding how criminal trials function and how verdicts are reached.

• 🔍 The Rules of Relevance: Every piece of evidence that a party wishes to present in court must be relevant. This means it must have any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Think of relevance as the first gatekeeper—blocking the way for any information that does not pertain directly to the case at hand. For instance, if someone is on trial for burglary, evidence that they were seen in the vicinity of the burglarized property would be relevant, while their history of unrelated traffic violations likely would not.

• 🚫 Exclusion for Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste: Not all relevant evidence makes it through. Evidence can be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a risk of causing undue prejudice, confusing the issues, or wasting time. For example, if the crime scene photographs are so gruesome that they may inflame the jury's emotions and distract from the factual determination of guilt or innocence, a judge might exclude them to prevent unfair bias.

• 🔐 The Reliability Standard: Let's focus on the trustworthiness of the evidence. Scientific evidence, for example, must come from a reliable method that has gained acceptance in its field. Otherwise, it might be deemed 'junk science' and be excluded. A forensic test linking DNA from the crime scene to the defendant would generally be considered reliable, provided the lab procedures are proven to be sound and the interpretation of results follows accepted standards.

• 🚨 Hearsay Hurdles: Hearsay, or testimony about what someone else said outside of court, is generally inadmissible unless it meets one of many exceptions. This rule is based on the idea that out-of-court statements cannot be cross-examined for their veracity. However, if someone made a statement while they were dying, believing they were about to die, that statement might be considered an exception due to its perceived reliability, often referred to as a "dying declaration."

• 👮 The Exclusionary Rule: Sometimes, even highly relevant evidence is excluded if it has been obtained in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights. This is known as the exclusionary rule and most frequently applies to evidence gathered in a manner that violates the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Consider law enforcement finding incriminating materials in a suspect's home without a warrant or valid exception; these materials would typically be excluded from evidence, lest we condone breaking the law to enforce it.

• 📝 Authentication and Chain of Custody: Presenting physical evidence? It's critical to establish authentication and maintain a chain of custody. Authentication means demonstrating that the evidence is what it purports to be. Chain of custody refers to the chronological documentation showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and disposition of evidence. If the prosecution presents a knife allegedly used in a stabbing, they must show records of who collected it, how it was stored, and that it hasn't been altered or tampered with since its collection.

The dance of evidence in criminal trials is a careful balance between ensuring all the relevant facts are considered and protecting the integrity of the courtroom. Evidence must not only be relevant to the case but must also be obtained and presented in accordance with the law and judicial standards. The intricate rules and practices underline the justice system's commitment to both uncovering the truth and upholding the rights of all parties involved.

What’s Next?

We’ll be back in a few days to teach you more about legal concepts. In the meantime, if you know somehow who might benefit from reading Answers on Law, please share or forward this article. Sharing is the #1 way the newsletter is able to help more people. Thanks! 🙏